Search found 4 matches
- Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:00 am
- Forum: EST3 Rules
- Topic: Eliminate DLYA for an Alarm via a SW
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8393
Re: Eliminate DLYA for an Alarm via a SW
YES! (Sorry - I'm feeling kinda GREAT. I just finished a HUGE project) ..... 'is it possible to turn off an alarm which is connected to a CC1 via a switch(SW)?' Already answered ... but for details: 1st rule : Alarm smoke '1fl_*' : On Vis 'CC1_Fl1'; (Remember EST rules default to a LOW priority) 2nd...
- Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:14 am
- Forum: EST3 Rules
- Topic: 2 modcom in one network
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7177
Re: 2 modcom in one network
Index the Account Labels and the buildings. You can have one rule that says: [Multi-Building Multi MODCOM GEN ALM] ALARM 'INPUT_LABEL_SYS<N:1-2:1>' : +SEND 'ACCOUNT<N>_FMOC' "01"; By specifing the inputs as either system1 or system2 you seperate the inputs by specifing the accounts as eith...
- Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:06 am
- Forum: EST3 Rules
- Topic: reducing input/output correlation warnings?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8676
Re: reducing input/output correlation warnings?
All, don't forge the simplest way to resolve 'Input is not associated with an Output' for Misc points is to just define any non-used output point as a 'COMMONALARMOUTPUT" device type. Common alarm outputs fire on any and every alarm. No programming required. (I usually place a comment in my rul...
- Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:42 pm
- Forum: EST3
- Topic: Merging of EST3 Database
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5893
Re: Merging of EST3 Database
Currently there is no public tool to merge databases. There will probably never be one. From EST's standpoint it is not profitable to make a limited use tool. From the installers standpoint if your salesperson sold the work correctly you will make more money appending an existing SDU than merging 2 ...